Chrome Extension
WeChat Mini Program
Use on ChatGLM

RONC-12. TREATMENT AGE AND NEUROCOGNITIVE OUTCOMES FOLLOWING PROTON BEAM RADIOTHERAPY FOR PEDIATRIC LOW GRADE GLIOMA

Neuro-oncology(2020)

Cited 0|Views4
No score
Abstract
Abstract INTRODUCTION Younger age at radiotherapy increases cognitive risk for patients with pediatric low grade glioma (LGG). We examined the impact of age at treatment on cognitive trajectories in LGG patients treated with proton radiotherapy (PRT) compared to patients treated without radiotherapy (surgery only; SO). METHODS We examined cognitive scores of 48 LGG patients on a prospective, longitudinal study. General linear mixed models evaluated change in cognitive scores over time. RESULTS The sample included 16 patients treated with PRT and 32 with SO (median follow-up=3.1 years, range 0.9–6.1). Median age of PRT patients was 8.2 years at diagnosis (range 1.0–14.4) and 9.4 years at PRT (range 4.2–16.7). 13 PRT patients also received surgery: 53.8% biopsy, 30.8% subtotal resection, 15.4% gross total resection. Tumor sites included: 31.2% hypothalamic/suprasellar, 25.0% optic pathway, 18.8% temporal, 25.0% other. Median age of SO patients was 8.2 years at diagnosis (range 2.9–18.6). Surgical outcomes were: 75.0% gross total resection, 21.9% biopsy/other. There were no group differences in diagnosis age, tumor volume, or shunt history (all p>0.05). Both PRT and SO groups displayed stable cognitive functioning over time (all p>0.1). Slopes (i.e., change in scores over time) did not differ between groups (all p>0.1). Age at treatment was not associated with slope or performance at last follow-up in either group (all p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS We observed stable cognitive functioning, independent of age at treatment, following PRT for LGG. Outcomes were similar to patients receiving surgery only. Further examination in a larger sample is warranted.
More
Translated text
Key words
Radiotherapy
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined