Chrome Extension
WeChat Mini Program
Use on ChatGLM

Does Left Atrial Appendage Morphology Have Any Impact On The Results Of Percutaneous Closure?

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL(2020)

Cited 1|Views2
No score
Abstract
Abstract Introduction Transcatheter left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion is an alternative treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), high CHADSVASC Score and a contra-indication to anticoagulants. This retrospective cohort study aims to evaluate the impact of LLA morphology on procedure outcomes. Methods Patients from eight French centers who underwent left atrial appendage occlusion from February 2012 to January 2017 were included in this retrospective cohort study. LLA morphology was described by preoperative cardiac computed tomography (CT). Clinical data and Transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) or CT results were collected during follow-up. Results Among 469 included patients, LAA morphologies were described in 215 cases 45.8%), 150 patients (70%) were implanted with Watchman devices, 57 (26%) with Amplatzer devices and 8 procedures (4%) failed. LAA Morphology was Chicken Wing (34%), Windsock (45%), cauliflower (18%) and 3% had another morphology including Cactus. There was no difference in patient characteristics between the different morphology groups. Mean follow-up was 9.6±11 months, during which 190 patients underwent LAA imaging (TEE in 171 and CT in 19 patients). There was no significant difference in the failure rate (p=0.72), duration of the procedure (p=0.065), peri-device leak (p=0.83) device-related thrombus (p=0.96) and the occurrence of stroke (p=1) during follow-up. Conclusion LLA morphology did not influence complication occurrence after occlusion in this cohort. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None
More
Translated text
Key words
atrial appendage morphology,percutaneous closure
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined