Implications of Subject Matter Expertise as a Requirement for Debriefing: A Randomized Control Trial

SIMULATION & GAMING(2020)

Cited 3|Views6
No score
Abstract
Introduction.Healthcare certification standards do not mentionsubject matter expertise. This research answers the question: Is there a difference in participant perception ofsimulation effectivenessbetween simulation facilitators and SME simulation facilitators during the debrief? Methods.Senior-level nursing students (N=120) were randomized into groups to complete one pediatric critical care simulation. Simulation-based education (SBE) was delivered across five weeks. Two experienced facilitators, one with pediatric expertise and one without, used the PEARLS method to debrief each simulation. Following each debrief, participants completed a demographic survey and a SET-M. Results were analyzed using SPSS Version 24. Results.Eighty-four students completed the survey and SET-M instrument. Independent samples t-tests showed no significant difference between facilitators based on the SET-M total scores (p=.516), or mean scores (p=.492). Debriefing-specific items also showed no difference (p=.983). Conclusion.Subject matter expertise did not change the perception of simulation effectiveness for undergraduate nursing students during a critical care scenario. While SMEs are valuable for scenario creation and coaching non-SME facilitators on key elements for guided reflection, they may not be required to facilitate the debrief. Further research in this area is needed.
More
Translated text
Key words
debrief,RCT,simulation,subject matter expert
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined