Continuing controversy regarding individualized surgical decision-making for patients with 1–4 cm low-risk differentiated thyroid carcinoma: A systematic review

Implementing high-quality randomized controlled trials is difficult for patients with 1–4 cm low-risk differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC). Controversy exists regarding whether lobectomy (LT) or total thyroidectomy (TT) is the optimal surgical approach over the short term and long term. Inconsistent recommendations have led to confusion amongst surgeons. Consequently, the outcomes of patients may be influenced. A great deal of new literature is published monthly, and there have been numerous studies supporting both LT and TT. Surgeons must spend considerable time and energy clarifying why controversy exists and which studies should be used as references. We selected 19 recent guidelines/consensuses for surgical approach in treating of 1–4 cm DTC. This study presents various topics relevant to the present debate, including disease-specific survival (DSS), persistence/recurrence, and complications between LT and TT, in patients with 1–4 cm low-risk DTC. This review includes a discussion of the background of those recommendations with regard to various medical, cultural and geographic environments. Additionally, recent technologies and future directions for current issues in risk identification were integrated into the review to provide a reference for individualized decision-making for patients with 1–4 cm low-risk DTC. Given different national conditions, there are different points of emphasis amongst the guidelines. Consideration of surgical approach should consider the character of both surgeons and patients. We should balance the relative benefits, risks and resulting quality of life in order to perform individualized surgical decision-making, and to make reasonable decisions in employing either TT or LT.