Sialendoscopic Management of Obstructive Salivary Gland Pathology: A Retrospective Analysis of 236 Cases

Purpose: To analyze and assess the results of treating obstructive salivary gland pathology by sialendoscopy or sialendoscopic-assisted surgery and analyze the difference in submandibular and parotid gland pathology.Patients and Methods: Between December 2012 and March 2020, 211 patients (236 procedures) underwent sialendoscopy/sialendoscopic-assisted surgery for treatment of obstructive salivary gland pathology. The cases were retrospectively analyzed for type of pathology, symptomatic relief, type of intervention (endoscopy alone or combined with open surgery), recurrence of symptoms, number of gland excisions, and complications encountered. Sialolith cases (n = 117) were treated by sialendoscopic/sialendoscopy-assisted surgical sialolithotomy using basket or graspers. Strictures (n = 69) were treated by serial dilatation or balloon dilatation with or without intraductal steroid. Mucous plugs (n = 26) were managed by sialendoscopic lavage and occasional retrieval using wire baskets.Results: There were 123 submandibular sialendoscopies in 118 patients and 113 parotid sialendoscopies in 95 patients. Of the 123 submandibular sialendoscopies, 99 were treated for sialolithiasis, 14 for strictures, 3 for mucous plugs, and 2 for foreign bodies. Of the 95 parotid sialendoscopies, 18 were treated for sialolithiasis, 55 for strictures, 23 for mucous plugs, and 1 for foreign body. The success rate was 85.3% for submandibular gland treatment and 92% for parotid gland treatment. About 62.7% of cases were treated by combined method (sialendoscopy with open approach) in submandibular gland and 50% in parotid gland. The number of gland excisions performed was 5 (2.1%).Conclusions: Sialendoscopy although associated with a gradual learning curve can be used for all cases of obstructive salivary gland pathology with excellent success rate and minimum morbidity. Parotid gland obstructive pathology is distinct from that seen in the submandibular gland, with strictures and mucous plugs contributing to most cases. Diagnosing and treatment planning for strictures and mucous plugs should therefore be as seamless as that for sialoliths. (C) 2020 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.