Laparoscopic Lavage vs Primary Resection for Acute Perforated Diverticulitis Long-term Outcomes From the Scandinavian Diverticulitis (SCANDIV) Randomized Clinical Trial

JAMA SURGERY(2021)

Cited 34|Views39
No score
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Perforated colonic diverticulitis usually requires surgical resection, with significant morbidity. Short-term results from randomized clinical trials have indicated that laparoscopic lavage is a feasible alternative to resection. However, it appears that no long-term results are available. OBJECTIVE To compare long-term (5-year) outcomes of laparoscopic peritoneal lavage and primary resection as treatments of perforated purulent diverticulitis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This international multicenter randomized clinical trial was conducted in 21 hospitals in Sweden and Norway, which enrolled patients between February 2010 and June 2014. Long-term follow-upwas conducted between March 2018 and November 2019. Patients with symptoms of left-sided acute perforated diverticulitis, indicating urgent surgical need and computed tomography-verified free air, were eligible. Those available for trial intervention (Hinchey stages More
Translated text
Key words
acute perforated diverticulitis,primary resection
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined