Safety And Efficacy Of Titrated Oral Misoprostol Solution Versus Vaginal Dinoprostone For Induction Of Labor: A Single-Center Randomized Control Trial

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of the hourly administration of titrated oral misoprostol solution (OMS) and vaginal dinoprostone for induction of labor.Methods: Titrated OMS was administrated hourly for induction of labor, starting with a dose of 20 mu g and terminating at a dose of 50 mu g. The safety and efficacy of OMS were compared with that of vaginal dinoprostone for induction of labor.Results: From June 2016 to October 2019, 2280 (78.3%) and 2115 (72.9%) women who received titrated OMS and vaginal dinoprostone, respectively, had a vaginal delivery (P = 0.005). Cesarean delivery was performed in 632 (21.7%) and 783 (27.0%) women who received titrated OMS and vaginal dinoprostone, respectively (P = 0.008). Tachysystole with changes in fetal heart rate (FHR) was seen in 104 (3.6%) and 249 (8.6%) women in the OMS and dinoprostone groups, respectively (P = 0.007). The frequency of non-reassuring FHR was lower in the OMS group compared to the dinoprostone group (P = 0.006).Conclusion: The titrated OMS has an efficacy comparable to vaginal dinoprostone. Moreover, it causes a lower incidence of cesarean delivery, lower frequency of tachysystole with changes in FHR, and non-reassuring FHR.