Mass administration of medicines in changing contexts: Acceptability, adaptability and community directed approaches in Kaduna and Ogun States, Nigeria.

Author summary Nigeria has the highest number of people affected by neglected tropical diseases in sub-Saharan Africa. Many of these diseases (onchocerciasis, lymphatic filariasis, schistosomiasis and soil transmitted helminths) can be prevented and treated using mass administration of medicines (MAM), which involves giving everyone in communities medicines based on their height. MAM has been going on for a long time in Nigeria and has achieved many successes, however, the programmatic, social, political and economic context in Nigeria is rapidly changing and there is limited evidence about the ability of current MAM approaches to ensure everyone who needs these medicines is able to access them during this time of change. We asked MAM programme implementers at different levels of the health system in Nigeria to tell us what they thought the key strengths and weaknesses of the current programme were and what they would do to make it better to ensure that everyone who needs the medicines would still be able to access them. They told us that the commitment of health workers and community leaders to telling communities about the medicines and encouraging them to accept them as well as the knowledge of the disability these diseases can cause had supported programme success. However, they also told us that in some areas, such as those with security concerns or where communities feel fatigued by the programme, the way communities respond is changing. To address the change in community responses our study participants felt that we need to support programme implementers with the time, tools and resources to build stronger more trusting relationships with communities to ensure everyone can access medicines. Nigeria has the highest burden of NTDs in sub-Saharan Africa. Commitments to reach the control and elimination of many Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs), particularly those amenable to preventive chemotherapy (onchocerciasis, schistosomiasis, soil transmitted helminths, lymphatic filariasis and trachoma) by 2020 are detailed in the London declaration. Strategies to reach targets build on existing approaches, one of which is the use of community directed intervention (CDI) methods to deliver the mass administration of medicines (MAM). However, treatment using this approach has been inconsistent and there are questions about the acceptability and adaptability of these interventions during periods of programmatic, social, and political change. This paper explores the current strengths and weaknesses of CDI approaches in MAM delivery. We consider the acceptability and adaptability of existing MAM approaches to ensure equity in access to essential treatments. Using qualitative methods, we explore implementer perspectives of MAM delivery. We purposively selected programme implementers to ensure good programmatic knowledge and representation from the different levels of health governance in Nigeria. Data collection took place across two States (Kaduna and Ogun). Our results indicate that CDI approaches have underpinned many historic successes in NTD programme acceptance in Nigeria, specifically in Kaduna and Ogun State. However, our results also show that in some contexts, factors that underpin the success of CDI have become disrupted presenting new challenges for programme implementers. Capturing the tacit knowledge of health implementers at varying levels of the health system, we present the current and changing context of MAM delivery in Kaduna and Ogun States and consolidate a platform of evidence to guide future programme delivery and research studies. We situate our findings within the broader NTD literature, specifically, in identifying how our findings align to existing reviews focused on factors that shape individual acceptance of MAM.