Clinical And Pathological Response To Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Different Chemotherapy Regimens Predicts The Outcome Of Locally Advanced Breast Cancer

Background: This retrospective analysis was designed to research whether clinical response partial response (PR)/complete response (CR) and pathological response (PCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy can translate into prognosis benefit pathological response in patients with locally advanced breast cancer and whether different chemotherapy regimens will influence the outcomes.Methods: One hundred and thirty-five patients with breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were included in the retrospective analysis. Patients were followed up strictly. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier analysis. The comparison of the clinical and pathological characteristics and recurrence was performed using the carried out by chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed by the Cox regression analysis.Results: Clinical response was strongly correlated with lymph nodes status (P=0.032). The OS comparison of pathological response between the pCR group and non-pCR groups did not exhibit statistically significant differences (P=0.400). A similar non-significant response result was observed in the comparison of clinical response between the PR/CR and SD/PD groups group (P=0.108). Univariate and multivariate analyses did not support clinical response (P=0.156 P=0.095 respectively) or pathological response (P=0.600 P=0.144 respectively) as the predictors of prognosis. There were no significant differences in either the comparison of the dinical response group it seems no statistically significance (P=0.496) or the comparison of the pathological response group (P=0.460). OS analyses across different neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens demonstrated no significant differences (P=0.307). In the PR/CR and PD/SD comparison of every single regimen, there were no significant differences. However, for patients with PR/CR patients from the comparison of five regimens, namely, TAC, FAC, AC-T, AT and TCBP demonstrated a significant difference (P=0.022). In the group of patients with luminal A breast cancer, the result of the Fisher's exact test approached significant (P=0.059).Conclusions: Neither PR/CR nor pCR can translate into long-term outcome benefit. PR/CR and PCR are not independent predictors in patients with advanced breast cancer. Patients who received a taxane + anthracydine regimen exhibited a higher recurrence rate than any other regimens, especially those patients with luminal A breast cancer.