Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) for detection of allograft rejection in pediatric kidney transplants

In pediatric transplantation, acute rejection is a major contributor of graft failure. Current approaches include kidney biopsy in response to graft dysfunction and/or the emergence of donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA). However, biopsy is associated with potential complications. Thus, there is a need for non-invasive diagnostics. Detection of donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA, AlloSure) > 1% is associated with rejection in adult kidney transplants. Here, we evaluate the utility of dd-cfDNA for identifying allograft rejection in pediatric patients. Between 10/2017 and 10/2019, 67 patients, who underwent initial testing with dd-cfDNA as part of routine monitoring or in response to clinical suspicion for rejection, were included. Biopsies were performed when dd-cfDNA > 1.0% or where clinical suspicion was high. Demographics, dd-cfDNA, antibody status, and biopsies were collected prospectively. Data were analyzed to determine predictive value of dd-cfDNA for identifying grafts at risk for rejection. 19 of 67 patients had dd-cfDNA testing as part of routine monitoring with a median dd-cfDNA score of 0.37 (IQR: 0.19-1.10). 48 of 67 patients who had clinical suspicion of rejection had median dd-cfDNA score of 0.47 (0.24-2.15). DSA-positive recipients had higher dd-cfDNA scores than those who were negative or had AT1R positivity alone (P = .003). There was no association between dd-cfDNA score and strength of DSA positivity. 7 of 48 recipients had a biopsy with a dd-cfDNA score <1%; two showed evidence of rejection. Neither DSA nor AT1R positivity was statistically associated with biopsy-proven rejection. However, dd-cfDNA >1% was diagnostic of rejection with sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 100% (AUC: 0.996, 0.98-1.00; P = .002). dd-cfDNA represents a non-invasive method for early detection of rejection in pediatric renal transplants. Our study shows dd-cfDNA to be highly predictive of histological rejection and superior to other indicators such as graft dysfunction or antibody positivity alone. Further studies are necessary to refine these initial observations.