Comparison Of Magnetic Resonance Imaging And Ultrasound Evaluations Of Zone Ii Partial Flexor Tendon Lacerations A Cadaveric Study

Objectives Surgical intervention for zone II high-grade partial flexor tendon lacerations is often required when more than half of the tendon width is torn. Reliable noninvasive tests are critical for optimizing clinical decision making. Our team previously investigated the use of ultrasound (US) for identification of high-grade zone II flexor digitorum profundus lacerations. In this study, we compared magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to US for the evaluation of high-grade partial flexor tendon lacerations in cadaveric specimens.Methods Dissection of 32 digits in 8 fresh-frozen upper extremity cadaveric specimens was performed. The flexor digitorum profundus tendons were randomized into 3 groups: intact, low-grade laceration, and high-grade laceration. A dynamic US examination was performed by a blinded musculoskeletal radiologist. The same specimens underwent hand coil MRI, which was read by the same blinded radiologist. Magnetic resonance imaging test performance metrics were calculated and compared to those computed for the US evaluation.Results For US evaluation of high-grade lacerations, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.5 and 1.0, with positive likelihood ratio (LR+) and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) values of infinity and 0.50, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for MRI evaluation were 0.2 and 1.0, with LR+ and LR- values of infinity and 0.80.Conclusions Both US and MRI are adequate at determining the presence of a high-grade laceration. Magnetic resonance imaging was more specific than US in identification of high-grade partial flexor tendon lacerations. Although less specific, US is a reasonable and less-expensive alternative to MRI when evaluating for clinically significant high-grade partial flexor tendon lacerations.