A new 7-point method facilitates accurate diagnosis of high-grade urothelial carcinoma in routine urinary cytology practice.

INTRODUCTION:This study was designed to identify the minimal and necessary cell morphologies to be considered for high-precision diagnosis of high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC) in a routine urinary cytology practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS:We included 338 urine cytology specimens from 11 medical facilities in Japan. Six experts evaluated these Papanicolaou-stained specimens using their own diagnostic criteria to categorize them within an initial 4-tiered classification system. Of the 338 cases, 70 HGUC and 32 benign cases (with a complete consensus diagnosis of 6 experts) were included for the analysis. Two of the cytologists evaluated the specimens for 20 specific cellular features. The results were analyzed using a contingency table and by discriminant analysis. RESULTS:Of the original 338 cases, 165 were originally diagnosed as HGUC, but only 70 (42.4%) were scored as malignant by all participating cytologists; of the 101 benign cases, only 32 (31.7%) were classified as such in all examinations. These specimens were re-evaluated by 6 experts using a panel of 20 specific cellular features used to distinguish between HGUC and benign diseases; tests of significance and discriminant analyses identified 7 critical features that were most useful for cytological diagnosis. Statistical analysis revealed that a focus on these 7 features led to a diagnosis of HGUC with a probability of over 95%. CONCLUSIONS:The accuracy of our presently used method to evaluate urinary cytology is not consistently high. This novel classification system, which focuses on 7 critical features, facilitates the high accurate diagnosis of HGUC in routine cytology practice.