A Clinical Trial Of Volume- Versus Pressure-Controlled Intraoperative Ventilation During Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgeries

Background: Intra-operative ventilation is often challenging in patients with morbid obesity undergoing bariatric surgery.Objectives: To test the noninferiority of pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) to volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) in respiratory mechanics.Setting: Bariatric Surgery Center, Iran.Methods: In a randomized open-labeled clinical trial, 66 individuals with morbid obesity undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgeries underwent intraoperative ventilation with either PCV or VCV. The measurements taken were peak and mean airway pressures (H2O), partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2), partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO2) and end-tidal carbon dioxide (CO2). We additionally collected pulse-oximetric oxygen saturation, inspiratory concentration of oxygen (FiO(2)), and hemodynamic variables. Data were analyzed with repeated measures over the time of intubation, after peritoneal insufflation, and every 15 minutes, thereafter up to one hour.Results: PCV mode was successful to sustain adequate ventilation in 97% of the patients, which was similar to the 94% success rate of the VCV mode. Peak airway pressure increased 6 cmH(2)O and endtidal CO2 rose by 5 mm Hg after abdominal insufflation in both groups (P= .850 and .376). Alveolararterial oxygen gradient similarly increased within 30 minutes after tracheal intubation both in PCV and VCV groups, with small trend of being higher in the VCV group. The ratio of dead space to tidal volumes (VD/VT) did not have a meaningful change (P = .724).Conclusion: PCV was noninferior to VCV during laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Either mode of ventilation could be alternatively used during the anesthesia care of these patients. (C) 2020 American Society for Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.