Comparison of three different bioleaching systems for Li recovery from lepidolite

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS(2020)

Cited 30|Views3
No score
Abstract
Three different biological systems, the consortium of autotrophic bacteria Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans , heterotrophic fungus Aspergillus niger and heterotrophic yeast Rhodotorula mucilaginosa , were investigated for lithium extraction from lepidolite. The bacterial consortium was the most effective, 11 mg l −1 of Li was dissolved in the absence of nutrients within 336 days. Fungal and yeast bioleaching was faster (40 days), however, with lower extraction efficiency. Bioaccumulation represented a main process of Li extraction by R. mucilaginosa and A. niger , with 92 and 77% of total extracted Li accumulated in the biomass, respectively. The X-ray diffraction analysis for bioleaching residue indicated changes caused by microorganisms, however, with differences between bacterial leaching and bioleaching by fungi or yeasts. The final bioleaching yields for bacterial consortium, A. niger and R. mucilaginosa were 8.8%, 0.2% and 1.1%, respectively. Two-step bioleaching using heterotrophic organisms followed by autotrophic bioleaching could lead to the increase of the process kinetics and efficiency. Bioaccumulation of Li offers strong advantage in Li extraction from solution.
More
Translated text
Key words
Biogeochemistry,Biotechnology,Environmental sciences,Metals,Microbiology,Science,Humanities and Social Sciences,multidisciplinary
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined