Impulsivity, decision-making and risk-taking behaviour in bipolar disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE(2020)

引用 31|浏览10
暂无评分
摘要
Despite the robust body of work on cognitive aspects of bipolar disorder (BD), a clear profile of associated impairments in impulsivity, decision-making and risk-taking from studies that use behavioural measures has yet to be established. A systematic review, across four electronic databases (PsycINFO, MEDLINE/PubMed, ScienceDirect and Scopus), of literature published between January 1999 and December 2018 was carried out in accordance with the PRISMA statement. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42018114684). A fixed-effect and random-effects meta-analysis using the Hedges' g (ES) estimate was performed. The analysis revealed significant impairment in BD individuals with medium effect sizes in various aspects of impulsivity - response inhibition (ES = 0.49;p< 0.0001), delay of gratification (ES = 0.54;p< 0.0001) and inattention (ES = 0.49;p< 0.0001) - and in decision-making (ES = 0.61,p= 0.0002), but no significant impairment in risk-taking behaviour (ES = 0.41;p= 0.0598). Furthermore, we found significant heterogeneity between studies for decision-making and risk-taking behaviour but not for impulsivity. Impaired risk-taking behaviour was significant in a subgroup of BD-I and euthymic individuals (ES = 0.92;p< 0.0001) with no significant heterogeneity. A stratification analysis revealed comparable results in euthymic and non-euthymic individuals for impulsivity. Our findings suggest that behaviour impulsivity is elevated in all phases of BD, representing a core and clinically relevant feature that persists beyond mood symptoms. More studies about decision-making and risk-taking are necessary to establish if they are impaired in BD and to analyze the role of mood state.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Bipolar disorder,decision-making,impulsivity,meta-analysis,risk-taking behaviour,systematic review
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要