Comparison Of Various Intraocular Lens Formulas Using A New High-Resolution Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomographer

Purpose: To compare vergence, artificial intelligence, and combined intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas using a new swept-source optical coherence tomographer (SS-OCT) and to analyze their performance based on manifest and estimated refractive outcomes of cataract surgery.Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pecs Medical School, Pecs, Hungary.Design; Retrospective data analysis.Methods: Optical biometry readings of patients who underwent uneventful cataract removal and implantation of a monofocal acrylic IOL were used to predict IOL power with Barrett Universal II (BUII), Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Radial Basis Function (RBF) 2.0, Kane, Ladas Super Formula, and SRK/T. All the implanted IOLs were calculated by using the Haigis formula. The arithmetic prediction error and median and mean absolute refractive errors for all formulas were computed. The percentage of eyes within +/- 0.25 diopters (D), +/- 0.50 D, and +/- 1.0 D of prediction error was calculated.Results: A total of 95 eyes of 95 patients with a mean age of 68.80 +/- 7.57 years were included. There was a statistically significant difference in absolute prediction error across the 8 IOL calculation formulas (P < .0001). Haigis showed the lowest mean absolute error, and it differed significantly from the BUII, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Lades, RBF 2.0, and SRK/T formulas (P < .05). In terms of eyes within +/- 0.25 D, +/- 0.50 D, and +/- 1.0 D of prediction error, the Haigis formula showed the overall best performance.Conclusions: The results indicated that a recently developed SS-OCT provided accurate ocular biometry measurements before cataract surgery, and the Haigis formula incorporated in its software enabled precise calculation of IOL refractive power. Copyright (C) 2020 Published by Wolters Kluwer on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS