Der Gendergap in der medizinischen Spitzenforschung Eine szientometrische Analyse zur Repräsentation weiblicher Autoren in hochrangigen medizinischen Journalen The gender gap in highest quality medical research A scientometric analysis of the representation of female authors in highest impact medica

Objective The study aims to elucidate the state of gender equality in high-impact medical research, analyzing the representation of female authorships from January, 2008 to September, 2017. Methods 133 893 male and female authorships from seven high-impact medical journals were analyzed. The key methodology was the combined analysis of the relative frequency, odds ratio and citations of female authorships. The Prestige Index measures the distribution of prestigious authorships between the two genders. Originalarbeit e85 Bendels MH et al. Der Gendergap in... Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2018; 143: e85–e94 H er un te rg el ad en v on : U ni ve rs ity o f M as sa ch us et ts A m he rs t. U rh eb er re ch tli ch g es ch üt zt . Results 35.0 % of all authorships and 34.3 % of the first, 36.1 % of the coand 24.2 % of the last authorships were held by women. Female authors have an odds ratio of 0.97 (KI: 0.93 – 1.01) for first, 1.36 (KI: 1.32 – 1.40) for cound 0.57 (KI: 0.54 – 0.60) for last authorships compared to male authors. The proportion of female authorships exhibits an annual growth of 1.3 % overall, with 0.5 % for first, 1.2 % for co-, and 0.8 % for last authorships. Women are underrepresented at prestigious authorship compared to men (Prestige Index = –0.38). The underrepresentation accentuates in highly competitive articles attracting the highest citation rates, namely, articles with many authors and articles that were published in highest-impact journals. Multi-author articles with male key authors are more frequently cited than articles with female key authors. The gender-specific differences in citation rates increase the more authors contribute to an article. Women publish fewer articles compared to men (39.6 % female authors are responsible for 35.0 % of the authorships) and are underrepresented at productivity levels of more than 1 article per author. Distinct differences at the country level were revealed. Conclusion High impact medical research is characterized by few female group leaders as last authors and many female researchers being first or co-authors early in their career. It is very likely that this gender-specific career dichotomy will persistent in the next decade.