Patient Outcomes With Use Of Computed Tomography Angiography In Acute Ischemic Stroke And Transient Ischemic Attack: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis

ObjectivesIt remains uncertain whether computed tomography angiography (CTA) in ischemic strokes and transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) benefits patient outcomes beyond those eligible for endovascular therapy. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the use of CTA against other imaging modalities for recurrent stroke, mortality, disability, emergency department (ED) revisits, or changes in management in ischemic stroke and TIA. (PROSPERO: 349590)MethodsMEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched. We included studies evaluating CTA against non-CTA imaging modalities for outcomes of interest in ischemic stroke or TIA. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed study quality. Data were pooled by the generic inverse variance method. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q statistic and quantified by I-2. Quality of the evidence was assessed by GRADE.ResultsWe found 12 eligible cohort studies involving 17,481 patients, and no eligible RCTs. No changes were detected in recurrent stroke, mortality, or disability when CTA was compared against pooled imaging modalities, nor compared to non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) alone. The evidence for each outcome was graded as low quality to very low quality.ConclusionsCTA use was not associated with significant reductions in recurrent stroke, mortality, or disability in ischemic stroke and TIA patient compared with other imaging modalities. More high-quality studies are needed.