The Influence of High Flow Nasal Cannulae on the Outcomes of Severe Respiratory Disease in Children Admitted to a Regional Hospital in South Africa

In settings where access to paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) facilities is constrained and transfer capacity is limited, High Flow Nasal Cannulae (HFNC) might fill an important service gap. The aim of this study was to document the effect of HFNC on the outcomes of children admitted with severe respiratory disease at a regional hospital without a PICU in Cape Town, South Africa. It is a 4-year retrospective analysis documenting two periods of 2 years each, one before (2013-15) and one after (2016-18) the initiation of HFNC use. Patients were between the ages of 2 months and 13 years and had been admitted to a paediatric ward. Outcomes were defined by the need for transfer to a tertiary hospital, the need for invasive ventilation and death. There were 90 instances of HFNC use with a significant reduction in the number of children who were transferred (59 vs. 31), invasively ventilated (20 vs. 6, p <= 0.01) and who died (3 vs. 0, p = 0.02). Before HFNC implementation, there was also a significantly greater proportion of transferred children who remained on low flow nasal cannulae (15 vs. 2, p <= 0.001) at the tertiary hospital. Children who failed HFNC use tended to do this within a day of initiation (Median 11 vs. 60 h for success, p <= 0.001). There were no complications related to its use. We believe that in our setting the utilization of HFNC has helped to timeously and accurately identify children needing to be transferred and may mitigate against severe respiratory disease progression.