Sediment metal enrichment and ecological risk assessment of ten ports and estuaries in the World Harbours Project

G. F. Birch, J. -H. Lee, E. Tanner, J. Fortune, N. Munksgaard, J. Whitehead, C. Coughanowr, J. Agius, J. Chrispijn, U. Taylor, F. Wells, J. Bellas, V. Besada, L. Vinas, A. Soares-Gomes, R. C. Cordeiro, W. Machado, R. E. Santelli, M. Vaughan, M. Cameron, P. Brooks, T. Crowe, M. Ponti, L. Airoldi, R. Guerra, A. Puente, A. G. Gomez, G. J. Zhou, K. M. Y. Leung, P. Steinberg

MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN(2020)

Cited 38|Views33
No score
Abstract
Ten global harbours were assessed for sediment quality by quantifying the magnitude of anthropogenic change and ecological risk. Anthropogenic change (enrichment) was high for Derwent River and Sydney estuary, moderate for Santander Harbour, Rio de Janeiro and Dublin Port, slight for Hong Kong, minimal for Darwin. All 10 enrichment indices used showed similar results. Derwent River sediment was rated at high ecological risk, followed by Sydney and Santander estuaries with moderate risk. Auckland and Darwin sediments exhibited minimal ecological risk and sediment in the remaining harbours (Dublin, Hong Kong, Ravenna, Ria de Vigo and Rio de Janeiro) were assessed at slight ecological risk. The extraordinary variety of environments and types/quantities/qualities of data investigated resulted in as much a critique and development of methodology, as an assessment of human impact, including unique techniques for elemental normalisation and contaminant classification. Recommendations for an improved technical framework for sediment quality assessment are provided.
More
Translated text
Key words
Sediment quality guidelines,Environmental indices,Anthropogenic change,Normalisation,Classification scheme
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined