谷歌浏览器插件
订阅小程序
在清言上使用

Comparison of Copan ESwab and FLOQSwab for COVID-19 Diagnosis: Working around a Supply Shortage

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY(2020)

引用 64|浏览37
暂无评分
摘要
On March 16th 2020, WHO Director-General stated “You cannot fight a fire blindfolded. And we cannot stop this [COVID-19] pandemic if we don9t know who is infected. We have a simple message for all countries: test, test, test. Test every suspected case.” (https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19-16-march-2020) This strategy hinges on the availability of appropriate, validated collection and transport systems to ensure preservation of nucleic acids and compatibility with downstream molecular testing – an acute challenge in the current pandemic. We present direct comparison of COVID-19 specimens collected with FLOQswab Nasopharyngeal Swab preserved in universal transport medium (Copan UTM System, Copan, Italy, catalog No.305C), optimized for viral specimens, and flocked regular nylon tip swab preserved in liquid amies (Eswab Collection system, Copan, Italy, catalog No. 480C), optimized for bacterial specimens.
更多
查看译文
关键词
COVID-19,diagnostic microbiology,molecular diagnostic,public health
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要