Cryothermal atrial linear ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation ~ Insight from the comparison with radiofrequency atrial linear ablation ~.

Background Atrial linear lesions are generally created with radiofrequency energy. We sought to evaluate the feasibility of cryothermal atrial linear ablation. Methods and Results Twenty-one atrial fibrillation (AF) patients underwent linear ablation on the left atrial (LA) roof, mitral isthmus (MI), and cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) with 8-mm-tip cryocatheters following pulmonary vein isolation. The data were compared with those of 31 patients undergoing linear ablation with irrigated-tip radiofrequency catheters. Conduction block was successfully created in 18 of 20 (90%), 9 of 21 (43%), and 20 of 20 (100%) on the LA roof, MI, and CTI by endocardial cryoablation alone with 19.0 (12.0-24.0), 30.0 (23.0-34.0), and 14.0 (14.0-16.0) minute cryo applications, respectively. The presence of either an interposed circumflex artery or pouch at the MI was significantly associated with failed MI block (P = .04). Conduction block was created in 25 of 31 (83.9%), 27 of 31 (87.1%), and 30 of 31 (96.8%) on the roof, MI, and CTI, respectively, by radiofrequency ablation. During the 17.5 (13.0-31.7) months of follow-up, freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) was significantly higher in the cryo group (P = .05); especially, recurrent AT was more frequent in the RF group (8/31 vs 1/21; P = .03). Conduction block across the roof, MI, and CTI was durable in 6 of 12 (50.0%), 4 of 12 (33.3%), and 9 of 12 (75.0%) patients during second procedures. All nine patients (except one) with recurrent ATs had at least one roof or MI conduction resumption. Conclusions Cryoablation is effective for creating a roof and CTI linear block, however, creating MI block by endocardial ablation alone was often challenging. Conduction resumption of LA linear block is common and recurrent arrhythmias, especially iatrogenic ATs, are more frequently observed after radiofrequency linear ablation.