Digital Self-Monitoring: Does Adherence Or Association With Outcomes Differ By Self-Monitoring Target?

Meghan L. Butryn, Kathryn M. Godfrey, Mary K. Martinelli,Savannah R. Roberts, Evan M. Forman,Fengqing Zhang

OBESITY SCIENCE & PRACTICE(2020)

引用 21|浏览2
暂无评分
摘要
Objective Digital self-monitoring of eating, physical activity, and weight is increasingly prescribed in behavioural weight loss programmes. This study determined if adherence rates or associations with outcomes differed according to self-monitoring target (ie, self-monitoring of eating versus physical activity versus weight). Methods Participants in a 3-month, group-based weight loss programme were instructed to use an app to record food intake, wear a physical activity sensor, and use a wireless body weight scale. At post-treatment, weight loss was measured in clinic and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) was measured by research-grade accelerometer. Results Adherence to self-monitoring decreased significantly over time for eating and weight but not physical activity. Overall, adherence to self-monitoring of weight was lower than that of eating or physical activity. Greater adherence to self-monitoring of eating, physical activity, and weight each predicted greater weight loss. Only greater adherence to self-monitoring of eating was associated with greater bouted minutes of MVPA. Conclusions Findings from this study suggest that self-monitoring should be considered a target-specific behaviour rather than a unitary construct when conceptualizing adherence and association with treatment outcomes.
更多
查看译文
关键词
monitoring,obesity treatment,weight loss
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要