谷歌Chrome浏览器插件
订阅小程序
在清言上使用

Differences of right ventricular diastolic stiffness in pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL(2019)

引用 0|浏览59
暂无评分
摘要
Background: Right ventricular (RV) fibrosis contributes partly to the RV diastolic stiffness in pulmonary hypertension (PH), however it is still unknown whether this contribution is similar in different types of PH. Therefore, we investigated whether there is a different relation of RV fibrosis to RV diastolic stiffness in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Methods: RV end-diastolic elastance (stiffness, Eed) was determined in 56 treatment-naive PH patients (PAH, n=37; CTEPH, n=19) via single-beat pressure-volume analyses. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) native T1-mapping was used as measure for focal myocardial fibrosis using regions of interest at RV free wall and interventricular insertion points (IVIPs). Results: Both PH groups were similar in terms of age, hemodynamics (pulmonary vascular resistance and mean pulmonary artery pressure) and native T1-values of both regions of interest. We observed higher RV Eed in PAH compared to CTEPH patients (0.59±0.37 versus 0.39±0.31 mmHg·mL-1, P<0.05). In CTEPH, RV Eed was modestly related to native T1-values of the RV free wall (r=0.50; P=0.02), while a trend towards an association with IVIPs was observed (r=0.44; P=0.05). In PAH patients, RV Eed was not related to native T1-values of any region of interest. Conclusion: CMR derived focal fibrosis of the right ventricle correlates with RV diastolic stiffness in CTEPH but not in PAH. This may suggest that underlying causes of RV diastolic stiffness are different in PAH and CTEPH.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Pulmonary hypertension,Chronic diseases
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要