Resurrecting immortal-time bias in the study of readmissions.

HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH(2020)

引用 2|浏览14
暂无评分
摘要
Objective To compare readmission rates as measured by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) methods. Data Sources 20 percent sample of national Medicare data for patients undergoing cystectomy, colectomy, abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between 2010 and 2014. Study Design Retrospective cohort study comparing 30-day readmission rates. Data Collection/Extraction Methods Patients undergoing cystectomy, colectomy, abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, and total knee arthroplasty between 2010 and 2014 were identified. Principal Findings Cystectomy had the highest and total knee arthroplasty had the lowest readmission rate. The NSQIP measure reported significantly lower rates for all procedures compared to the CMS measure, which reflects an immortal-time bias. Conclusions We found significantly different readmission rates across all surgical procedures when comparing CMS and NSQIP measures. Longer length of stay exacerbated these differences. Uniform outcome measures are needed to eliminate ambiguity and synergize research and policy efforts.
更多
查看译文
关键词
administrative data uses,health policy,politics,law,regulation,Medicare,program evaluation,quality of care,patient safety,surgery
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要