P1742Is Time to Telemedicine Diagnosis (TTD) Analogous to Door to Balloon Time?

Abstract Background Telemedicine is a powerful, cost-efficient, and scalable tool for population-based AMI management. Traditional metrics of D2N, D2B do not gauge telemedicine effectiveness. We explored the utility of TTD in 784,947-screened patients within the Latin America Telemedicine Infarct Network (LATIN). Purpose To evaluate the competence of TTD as an efficiency indicator in telemedicine. Methods LATIN employed a spoke-hub strategy to expand access in Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, and Argentina. Small clinics (spokes) in remote areas were strategically connected to PCI-capable facilities (hubs). Experts at 4 remote locations provided urgent EKG diagnosis via tele-consultation, additionally, they triggered ambulance dispatch and implementation of guidelines-based protocols. Investing in updated telemedicine technology provided a system-wide TTD reduction. Results 714,450 patients were screened for AMI at 350 LATIN centers (Brazil 143, Colombia 118, Mexico 82, Argentina 7). Within our territories 8,448 (1.08%) patients were diagnosed as STEMI; 3,911 (46.3%) were urgently reperfused, of those 3,049 (78%) underwent Primary PCI. TTD was 3 min, demonstrating 98.9% tele-accuracy. D2B was 51 min; in-hospital mortality 5.2%. We encountered a linear correlation between D2B and TTD. The latter was, also, inversely related to the number of screened patients - both associations are favorable for LATIN. Conclusions TTD is an important indicator of telemedicine efficiency. LATIN will continue to explore this value's strength and other important associations.