Demineralized Bone Matrix and Resorbable Mesh Bilaminate Cranioplasty Is Ineffective for Secondary Reconstruction of Large Pediatric Cranial Defects.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery(2020)

引用 3|浏览3
暂无评分
摘要
Replacement of the autologous bone flap after decompressive craniectomy can be complicated by significant osteolysis or infection with large defects over scarred dura. Demineralized bone matrix is an alternative to autologous reconstruction, effective when reconstructing large defects using a resorbable mesh bilaminate technique in primary cranioplasty, but this technique has not been studied for revision cranioplasty and the setting of scarred dura. Retrospective review was performed of patients receiving demineralized bone matrix and resorbable mesh bilaminate cranioplasty for postdecompressive craniectomy defects. Seven patients (mean age, 4.2 years) were identified with a mean follow-up of 4.0 years. Computed tomography before the demineralized bone matrix and resorbable mesh bilaminate cranioplasty and at least 1 year postoperatively were compared. Defects were characterized and need for revision was assessed. All patients had craniectomy with associated hemidural scarring. Five patients had autologous bone flap cranioplasty associated with nearly total osteolysis, and two patients had deferral of bone flap before demineralized bone matrix and resorbable mesh bilaminate cranioplasty. Demineralized bone matrix and resorbable mesh bilaminate cranioplasty demonstrated unpredictable and poor ossification, with bony coverage unchanged at postoperative follow-up. All patients required major revision cranioplasty at a mean time of 2.5 years. Porous polyethylene was successfully used in six of the revisions, whereas exchange cranioplasty was used in the remaining patient, with a mean follow-up of 1.4 years. Although demineralized bone matrix and resorbable mesh bilaminate is appropriate for primary cranioplasty, it should be avoided in the setting of scarred or infected dura in favor of synthetic materials or exchange cranioplasty. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: Therapeutic, IV.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要