Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation Versus Solid Organ Transplantation: Innate-Adaptive Immune Interphase

Purpose of review Vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA), a life-enhancing treatment for patients with complex tissue defects, trauma or illness, expounds upon the foundation of solid organ transplantation (SOT), the gold standard in end-stage organ failure. As innate and adaptive immunity remain the fundamental concern, this review highlights divergent immunobiology responses in VCA and SOT recipients. Recent findings Host innate immune activation drives peritransplant tissue ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). Despite the direct relationship between ischemia-reperfusion (IR)-stress and cell-mediated acute rejection, the mechanism of how IRI may affect VCA loss needs investigation. With skin grafts being highly immunogenic, the incidence of cell-mediated rejection is higher in VCA than SOT; whereas ex-vivo perfusion may exert cytoprotection against IRI in VCA and SOT. New treatment concepts, such as topical immunosuppression or cell-based tolerogenic therapies, may avoid systemic immunosuppression in VCA. Although antibody-mediated rejection is relatively rare in VCA and its disease seems to be distinct from that in SOT, little is known as to whether and how IRI may influence humoral immune rejection cascade in VCA or SOT. Further understanding of the innate-adaptive immune crosstalk should contribute to much needed development of novel therapies to improve VCA outcomes, based on strategies established in SOT.