The Use Of Dehydrated Human Amniotic Membrane Versus Amniotic/Chorionic Membrane Allografts To Treat Partial Thickness Facial Burns

Background: Facial burns have significant physical and psychologic effects on patients. Human dehydrated amniotic membrane represents novel technology, yet its outcome has not been sufficiently studied to guide practice. The objective of our study is to compare the benefits of amniotic membrane (DHAM) to amniotic/chorionic membrane (DHACM) skin substitutes to treat partial thickness facial burns.Methods: Retrospective review of data collected from our institutional burn registry from 2012 to 2016. Demographic characteristics including age, total body surface area (TBSA) burn and injury severity scores were collected and outcome measures were compared between the 2 groups. Paired sample t-test and Chi-squared were used with significance defined as P<0.05.Results: A total of 77 adult patients with partial thickness facial burns who received DHAM and DHACM skin substitutes were included in the analysis. The mean age for the DHAM group was 39.8 compared to 41.4 for the DHACM. Mean TBSA was similar, with 10.9% in the DHAM group compared to 8.3% in the DHACM. Patients receiving DHAM had higher requirement for skin substitute surgical reapplications as compared to the DHACM group (23.7% versus 5.1%, P <= 0.05). Remaining morbidities remained low and not significantly different between patients receiving DHAM and DHACM substitutes (P>0.05).Conclusion: The DHAM and DHACM skin substitutes are valid and safe alternatives in the treatment of adult partial thickness facial burns.