On the Unbearable Lightness of Being a Constructionist

This paper deals with the question of the positionality of constructionists. I begin by considering some of the pressures on constructionists to compromise, if not abandon, their neutral stance as disengaged observers of definitional processes. After reaffirming the value of studying definitional processes, without regard for the veracity of claims or even the existence of the putative conditions referenced, I discuss how some ontological and epistemological stances facilitate a focusing of attention on these processes while others are diversionary. I end by making the case for thinking through carefully where we stand, mindful of the consequences as well as our goals as analysts.