Current evidence and rationale of percutaneous therapy for chronic total coronary occlusions

The prevalence of chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions in coronary arteries is notably high in patients with significant coronary artery disease. However, only a relatively small fraction of observed CTOs classically go for revascularization. Recent advances in techniques and equipment has greatly improved the success rates of CTO revascularization while reducing complications. There has also been an increasing body of evidence regarding clinical benefit of CTO revascularization. However, until recently majority of the evidence was observational and based on data from large multicenter registries. Recent randomized studies have reported on clinical benefits of CTO revascularization particularly with relief of angina. However, there is heterogeneity of results among different studies and the magnitude of benefit is not consistently seen in all studies. This article reviews the existing literature on the current evidence regarding clinical benefits and other rationale for CTO revascularization.