Erratum to ‘2015 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and testing’ [Journal of Arrhythmia 32/1 (2016) 1–28]

There was an error on the above article. The sentence “Even if a dual-chamber ICD is implanted, dual-chamber discrimination should be programmed only if the atrial lead becomes chronic or if atrial sensing is unreliable” is not correct. It should read: “Even if a dual- chamber ICD is implanted, dual-chamber discrimination should be programmed only if the atrial lead becomes chronic or if atrial sensing is reliable”.