Improving Compliance With Institutional Review Board Continuing Review Requirements.

JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS(2019)

引用 3|浏览1
暂无评分
摘要
Continuing review of ongoing research is one way by which institutional review boards (IRBs) ensure protection of human subjects. Among the 25 Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) human research protection program performance metrics collected annually since 2010, lapse in IRB continuing reviews had the highest noncompliance rate. In 2013, 10 facilities with lapse rates higher than the VA national average for 3 consecutive years from 2011 to 2013 implemented remedial action plans. Using data from 2011 through 2018, we demonstrated that 70% of these facilities' lapse rates remain significantly improved. In contrast, none of the 10 facilities with their lapse rates that were higher than the national averages in 2 out of 3 years from 2011 to 2013 and that did not implement remedial action plans showed any improvement. Thus, implementation of effective remedial measures in facilities with high lapse rates can result in long-lasting improvement in the majority of these facilities.
更多
查看译文
关键词
human subjects protection,institutional review board,continuing review,lapse in IRB continuing review,remedial action plan
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要