A Re-examination of the Role of AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR 8 in Developmental Abnormalities Caused by the P1/HC-Pro Viral Suppressor of RNA Silencing

Plant viral suppressors of RNA silencing induce developmental defects similar to those caused by mutations in genes involved in the microRNA (miRNA) pathway. These abnormalities were originally thought to reflect a pleiotropic impact of silencing suppressors on miRNA control of plant development. However, subsequent work with the P1/HC-Pro potyviral suppressor of silencing showed that global impairment of the miRNA pathway was not responsible for the phenotypical anomalies. More recently, developmental defects caused by a P1/HC-Pro transgene under control of the 35S promoter were attributed to moderate upregulation of AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR 8 (ARF8), a target of miR167. The key piece of evidence in that work was that the developmental defects in the 35S-pro:P1/HC-Pro transgenic Arabidopsis were greatly alleviated in the F1 progeny of a cross with plants carrying the arf8-6 mutation. Arf8-6 is a SALK line T-DNA insertion mutant, a class of mutations prone to inducing transcriptional silencing of transgenes expressed from the 35S promoter. Here we report a re-investigation of the role of ARF8 in P1/HC-Pro-mediated developmental defects. We characterized the progeny of a cross between our 35S-pro:P1/HC-Pro transgenic Arabidopsis line and the same arf8-6 T-DNA insertion mutant used in the earlier study. The T-DNA mutation had little effect in the F1 generation, but almost all arf8-6/P1/HC-Pro progeny had lost the P1/HC-Pro phenotype in the F2 generation. However, this loss of phenotype was not correlated with the number of functional copies of the ARF8 gene. Instead, it reflected transcriptional silencing of the 35S-pro:P1/HC-Pro transgene, as evidenced by a pronounced decrease in P1/HC-Pro mRNA accompanied by the appearance of 35S promoter siRNAs. Furthermore, arf8-8, an independent loss-of-function point mutation, had no detectable effects on P1/HC-Pro phenotype in either the F1 or F2 generations. Together these data argue against the reported role of increased ARF8 expression in mediating developmental defects in P1/HC-Pro transgenic plants.