AN EXAMPLE OF INFECTIOUS DISEASE ADVICE IN PRIVATE HEALTHCARE FACILITIES

Aim In private healthcare facilities, the access to a specialized infectious disease (ID) advice is difficult. More, the lack of traceability is problematic and harmful for treatment and follow-up. We have tested an information technology (IT) application to improve medical transmission and evaluate an interdisciplinary ID activity. Methods In November 2015, three ID physicians (IDP) created an interdisciplinary activity, visiting patients and giving phone advices among ten private healthcare facilities. They are members of the complex bone and joint infection unit of the community hospital where they are attached. Since September 2016, each advice was prospectively recorded on a protected online information system. These data are available for consultation and modification by the three IDP. It is the first descriptive analysis of this database. Results From September 2016 to February 2017, 887 advices from 573 inpatients were collected. Median age was 69 years old and 56% of patients were male (n=320). Comorbidity was notified in 329 patients (57%): presence of a medical device (n=154), active neoplasia (n=76), mellitus diabetes (n=38) and renal failure (n=38) were the most common. Patients were hospitalized in a surgery unit in 49% of cases and of which 69% was the orthopaedic unit. By frequency, type of infection was prosthetic joint (n=111) and osteosynthesis device infection (n=67), urinary tract infection (n=57), skin infection (n=44), and catheter device infection (n=43). The presence of multidrug resistant bacteria was notified in 63 patients. Antibiotics were already administered before the first advice in 62% of patients. Advices were given after a medical consultation in the clinic in 353 cases (40%) and after a phone call with the physician in charge of the patient in 523 cases (60%). Antibiotics were disrupted or not introduced for 126 advices (14%), introduced for 133 advices (15%), modified in 337 advices (38%) and maintained unchanged in 291 advices (33%). New evaluation was effective for 171 patients (30%). Multidisciplinary meeting was requested for 54 patients. Conclusion Use of an information system for interdisciplinary and multisite ID activity has permitted with a better traceability to improve management of these septic patients, facilitate storage and transmission of medical information. It is a first overview of ID activity in private healthcare facilities and these tools appear essential in the development of such activity and for public health policy.