Chrome Extension
WeChat Mini Program
Use on ChatGLM

Integrating Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) and Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) As Predictive Panel of Response to Nivolumab in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).

Annals of oncology(2017)

Cited 0|Views46
No score
Abstract
Background: Cost-effectiveness and viability of new predictive markers for immunotherapy limit their application in clinical practice. This retrospective study explores PD-L1 expression and NLR as an easy feasible panel to predict benefit to Nivolumab. Methods: Out of 108 pre-treated NSCLC pts included in the Nivolumab expanded access program, 71 (66%) were evaluable for PD-L1 expression on archival tissue samples by immunohistochemistry (clone E1L3N, Cell Signalling Technology) and NLR on baseline blood cell count. PD-L1 positivity was defined as expression on ≥ 1% of tumor cells, while NLR was considered as high (NLR>3) or low (NLR<3). Progression free survival (PFS) was estimated by Kaplan Meyer method; the combined predictive value of PD-L1/NLR for PFS and overall survival (OS) was assessed using multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. Results: Pts were mostly males (63%), smokers (86%), with adenocarcinoma (76%); EGFR + (10%), K-RAS + (33%). Median PFS and OS to Nivolumab were 5.52 months (mo) (95% [CI] 4.5-8.05) and NR (95% [CI] 7.4-NR), respectively. 1-y OS was 51%. PFS to Nivolumab was not affected by PD-L1 status (PD-L1 >1% 13.2 mo, 95% [CI] 3.4-NR vs PDL1 <1% 6 mo, 95% [CI] 3.35-14.21; p= 0.51). High NLR significantly predicted poorer PFS than low NLR (NLR>3: 2.5 mo, 95% [CI] 2-5.29 vs NLR<3: 8.61 mo, 95% [CI] 4.86-23.02, p<0.001). Although median OS was not reached at the time of analysis, 25th percentile survival rate favored low NLR (NLR<3: 6.84 mo, 95% [CI] 4.98-7.88 vs NLR>3: 2.89 mo, 95% [CI] 2.5-4.3, p<0.001). Patients were divided in two cohorts according to combined PD-L1/NLR (cohort1: PD-L1+/low NLR, cohort 2: PD-L1-/high NLR). In the multivariate analysis, PFS to Nivolumab was significantly longer in cohort 1 (Cohort 1: 13.26 mo, 95% [CI] 3.42-NR vs Cohort 2: 2.5 mo, 95% [CI] 1.45-6.08, p < 0.0001). OS is available only for cohort 2 (OS 3.29 mo 95% [CI] 2.76-5.16). Conclusions: This retrospective study supports NLR as predictive biomarker for survival to immunotherapy and shows how the combined use of PD-L1/NLR can predict longer PFS to nivolumab treatment. This feasible panel may be routinely applied to select pts for immunotherapy avoiding more complex and expensive methods.
More
Translated text
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined