Postmortem X-ray Computed Tomography (CT) and Forensic Autopsy: A Review of the Utility, the Challenges and the Future implications

The utility of computed tomography (CT) for forensic autopsy is being defined. Small studies have indicated potential areas of use. Systematic studies are few. Evidence of the utility of CT as an autopsy substitute in fatal trauma cases has been inconsistent. Some studies show that there are injuries seen by CT that aren't detected by autopsy indicating that CT, at least, is likely useful as an autopsy adjunct. Research has been limited by small study populations, variation in postmortem interval, differences in protocols including CT slice thickness, who interpreted the scans (radiologists vs. pathologists), and how injuries were scored. Challenges exist to implement and use advanced imaging technology for the forensic autopsy. It is important to determine how to arrange these technologies into a coherent approach to postmortem diagnosis while not encumbering forensic pathologists. Forensic pathologists and radiologists require training in interpreting the unique aspects of postmortem CT scans. Some forensic pathologists might perceive imaging technology as a threat and express concern that it will make the autopsy obsolete. If CT is found to supplant or supplement autopsy in valuable ways, more comprehensive diagnostic information can be provided. If CT can supplant the use of autopsy in certain situations and significantly decrease autopsy numbers it will allow offices to achieve an annual cost savings and divert these resources to other needs. If CT becomes widely available and can supplant autopsy, it could make up some of the gap between the numbers of forensic pathologists available and the numbers needed nationally.