Advantages and pitfalls of an extended gene panel for investigating complex neurometabolic phenotypes

Targeted gene panels can be used to establish molecular diagnoses in paediatric cohorts. Reid et al. report that this approach is accurate, efficient and can be preferred to whole-exome or genome sequencing for patients with neurological symptomatology and clues suggestive of an inherited metabolic disorder.Targeted gene panels can be used to establish molecular diagnoses in paediatric cohorts. Reid et al. report that this approach is accurate, efficient and can be preferred to whole-exome or genome sequencing for patients with neurological symptomatology and clues suggestive of an inherited metabolic disorder.Neurometabolic disorders are markedly heterogeneous, both clinically and genetically, and are characterized by variable neurological dysfunction accompanied by suggestive neuroimaging or biochemical abnormalities. Despite early specialist input, delays in diagnosis and appropriate treatment initiation are common. Next-generation sequencing approaches still have limitations but are already enabling earlier and more efficient diagnoses in these patients. We designed a gene panel targeting 614 genes causing inborn errors of metabolism and tested its diagnostic efficacy in a paediatric cohort of 30 undiagnosed patients presenting with variable neurometabolic phenotypes. Genetic defects that could, at least partially, explain observed phenotypes were identified in 53% of cases. Where biochemical abnormalities pointing towards a particular gene defect were present, our panel identified diagnoses in 89% of patients. Phenotypes attributable to defects in more than one gene were seen in 13% of cases. The ability of in silico tools, including structure-guided prediction programmes to characterize novel missense variants were also interrogated. Our study expands the genetic, clinical and biochemical phenotypes of well-characterized (POMGNT1, TPP1) and recently identified disorders (PGAP2, ACSF3, SERAC1, AFG3L2, DPYS). Overall, our panel was accurate and efficient, demonstrating good potential for applying similar approaches to clinically and biochemically diverse neurometabolic disease cohorts.