Protein Structural Features in Winter Wheat: Benchmarking Diversity in Ontario Hard and Soft Winter Wheat

A set of 32 winter wheat lines and varieties was selected to benchmark Ontario winter wheat as a first step toward improving quality. Protein secondary structure, total and accessible thiols, rheological properties, gluten aggregation kinetics, and network forming capabilities of different polymers were determined for each wheat line. Results revealed that there were statistically significant differences among the lines selected (P < 0.05). The differences between hard and soft wheat classes were not as large as would be expected, however, despite the range of quality parameters measured. Benchmarks revealed that several soft wheat lines outperformed hard wheat lines in standard breadmaking quality measures. Protein conformation changed significantly as the moisture content of the samples increased to mimic different model product systems: flour, dough, and batter. The conformation of the flour samples exhibited different patterns between hard and soft wheat classes, although these differences became narrower in the dough and batter states. Principal component analysis (PCA) factors included most quality parameters measured, with the notable exceptions of solvent retention capacity tests and total thiols. Protein conformation and accessible thiols were significant PCA factors that tended to override the rheological measures of quality they represented, suggesting that protein secondary structure and disulfide bonding patterns are fundamental aspects of rheological quality measures.