The Effects of an Injury Prevention Program in an Aquatic Environment on Landing Forces: 1611 Board #7 May 28, 1

MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE(2015)

Cited 0|Views2
No score
Abstract
Lower extremity musculoskeletal injuries, such as ACL injuries, account for a majority of sports and recreational related injuries and are of major concern to the physically active population. Exercise-based injury prevention programs (IPP) can improve landing technique and reduce injury risk. Injury prevention programs performed in an aquatic-based environment may potentially elicit the same improvements as land-based programs, but in an environment with less external stress to the joints. PURPOSE: Examine the effects of a six-week aquatic-based IPP on landing technique as measured by peak vertical ground reaction forces (VGRF). We hypothesized that the aquatic-based IPP would reduce VGRF, and thus improve landing technique. METHODS: 15 healthy, physically active females (age: 20.6±2.1y; mass: 62.02±8.18kg; height: 164.74±5.98cm) volunteered to participate. All participants completed an aquatic-based IPP three times a week for six weeks in the pool. The IPP was modified from land-based IPPs to be able to be performed in the pool while including balance, strengthening, flexibility and plyometric exercises. We conducted a within-subject analysis of variance for each limb to evaluate the average peak VGRF before (PRE), after (POST) and 4 months following (RET) the intervention (α<0.05). All participants performed three trials of a standardized jump landing task at PRE, POST, and RET while landing with both feet on a non-conductive force plate that measured VGRF at 1000 Hz. A customized software program calculated peak VGRF between initial ground contact (VGRF>10N) and take-off (VGRF<10N) of the landing task. Peak VGRF values were normalized by body weight (N). RESULTS: We observed that the aquatic-based IPP significantly reduced VGRF scores between PRE (Right peak VGRF (= 2.67 ± .71%BW; Left= 2.70 ± .85%BW) and POST (Right= 2.23 ± .59%BW; Left= 2.24 ± .81%BW), and POST and RET (Right = 1.85 ± .89%BW Left= 1.65 ± .72%BW)(P <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The aquatic-based IPP improved landing technique as evident by peak VGRF. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of an IPP in an aquatic-environment and result in decreased VGRF and internal LE stress moments on joints, such as the knee, and can be used to reduce overall LE musculoskeletal injuries.
More
Translated text
Key words
Aquaculture Production Efficiency
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined