Meta-Analysis of Doxorubicin-Eluting Beads via Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization in the Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Yang Hui,Tang Ruihua, Li Jing, Liu Yaxiong, Li Ji,Ye Linjie, Shao Dongyan, Jin Mingliang,Huang Qingsheng, Shi Junling

Hepato-gastroenterology(2015)

引用 32|浏览0
暂无评分
摘要
BACKGROUND/AIMS:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of doxorubicin-eluting beads combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) compared with conventional TACE (cTACE). METHODOLOGY:PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched for articles published to identify randomized controlled trials evaluating efficacy and side effects between DEB-TACE and cTACE. The RR (relative risk) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated by the Revman 5.0 software. RESULTS:Totally 4 studies, including 527 patients, compared the efficacy and safety of DEB-TACE with cTACE. The DEB-TACE achieved fewer side effects in alopecia (p = 0.0002, RR = 0.05, 95% CI: 0.01-0.24) and myelosuppression (p = 0.009, RR = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.14-0.75). Meanwhile, there was no significant difference in efficacy evaluation including complete response (p = 0.16, RR = 1.36, 95% CI: 0.89-2.08), partial response (p = 0.48, RR = 1.14, 95% CI: 0.80-1.62), stable disease (p = 0.73, RR = 0.93,95% CI: 0.60-1.40), progressive disease (p 0.19, RR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.56-1.12), objective response (p = 0.26, RR 0.91, 95% CI: 0.48-1.72) and disease control (p = 0.05, RR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.00-1.39). CONCLUSIONS:DEB-TACE shows similar therapeutic efficacy to cTACE method and fewer adverse events.
更多
查看译文
关键词
transcatheter arterial chemoembolization,hepatocellular carcinoma,unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma,meta-analysis,doxorubicin-eluting
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要