Ebola Virus Isolation Using Huh-7 Cells has Methodological Advantages and Similar Sensitivity to Isolation Using Other Cell Types and Suckling BALB/c Laboratory Mice.

James Logue, Walter Vargas Licona,Timothy K Cooper, Becky Reeder,Russel Byrum,Jing Qin, Nicole Deiuliis Murphy,Yu Cong, Amanda Bonilla, Jennifer Sword,Wade Weaver,Gregory Kocher,Gene G Olinger,Peter B Jahrling,Lisa E Hensley,Richard S Bennett

VIRUSES-BASEL(2019)

引用 7|浏览31
暂无评分
摘要
Following the largest Ebola virus disease outbreak from 2013 to 2016, viral RNA has been detected in survivors from semen and breast milk long after disease recovery. However, as there have been few cases of sexual transmission, it is unclear whether every RNA positive fluid sample contains infectious virus. Virus isolation, typically using cell culture or animal models, can serve as a tool to determine the infectivity of patient samples. However, the sensitivity of these methods has not been assessed for the Ebola virus isolate, Makona. Described here is an efficiency comparison of Ebola virus Makona isolation using Vero E6, Huh-7, monocyte-derived macrophage cells, and suckling laboratory mice. Isolation sensitivity was similar in all methods tested. Laboratory mice and Huh-7 cells were less affected by toxicity from breast milk than Vero E6 and MDM cells. However, the advantages associated with isolation in Huh-7 cells over laboratory mice, including cost effectiveness, sample volume preservation, and a reduction in animal use, make Huh-7 cells the preferred substrate tested for Ebola virus Makona isolation.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Mice,Vero,Huh7,Monocyte Derived Macrophages,Virus isolation,Semen,Breast milk,Ebola virus
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要