Survey of peptide quantification methods and comparison of their reproducibility: A case study using oxytocin.

Chensheng Li,Sitaram Bhavaraju,Marie-Pier Thibeault,Jeremy Melanson, Andreas Blomgren,Torgny Rundlöf,Eric Kilpatrick,Carolyn J Swann,Timothy Rudd,Yves Aubin,Kevin Grant, Margaret Butt, WaiKei Shum,Tursun Kerim, William Sherwin,Yukari Nakagawa, Sergi Pavón, Silvia Arrastia,Tim Weel, Arunima Pola,Dinesh Chalasani, Steven Walfish,Fouad Atouf

Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis(2019)

引用 14|浏览22
暂无评分
摘要
USP’s peptide reference standards content is typically determined using an HPLC assay against an external standard for which the purity was determined by a mass balance approach. To explore the use of other analytical methods, the USP Biologics Department conducted a multi-laboratory collaborative study. The study determined the inter-laboratory variability for peptide quantitation using the following methods: HPLC assay, quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance (qNMR) spectroscopy, or amino acid analysis (AAA). The three methods were compared with regard to their suitability for quantitation of the nonapeptide oxytocin. In this study, the HPLC assay method using the same peptide bulk material as the standard showed the lowest inter-lab variability. The coefficient of variation (%CV) was calculated without counting the uncertainty associated with the purity assignment of the standard with mass balance. The proton qNMR method is a direct measurement of the peptide against an internal standard, which is not difficult to perform under common laboratory conditions. Because of the simpler operation and shorter analytical time, qNMR as a primary method for peptide reference standard value assignment deserves further exploration.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Peptide,Quantification,HPLC,NMR,Amino acid analysis (AAA)
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要