Chrome Extension
WeChat Mini Program
Use on ChatGLM

Damaged goods?: an empirical cohort study of blood specimens collected 12 to 23 hours after birth in newborn screening in California

Genetics in Medicine(2015)

Cited 16|Views6
No score
Abstract
Purpose: The current Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute standard recommends blood collection from 24 to 48 hours after birth for newborn genetic disorder screening. We used California population-level data to determine whether early specimens (collected from 12 to 23 hours) would also be considered satisfactory based on screening performance. Methods: Screening data from California Genetic Disease Screening Program were analyzed for false-negative and false-positive rates in four disease categories: metabolic disorders detectable by tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS); congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH); congenital hypothyroidism (CH); and initial immune reactive trypsinogen (IRT) for cystic fibrosis (CF). We compared the rates between the early-collection group (12 to 23 hours) and the standard-collection group (24 to 48 hours). Results: No significant difference of false-negative rate was detected between the two collection-timing groups. Early specimens had a significantly higher false-positive rate for CH (0.10 vs. 0.01%) and IRT (1.85 vs. 1.54%) but a lower false-positive rate for MSMS metabolic disorders (0.11 vs. 0.18%) and CAH (0.10 vs. 0.14%). Conclusion: Newborn specimens collected after 12 hours provided satisfactory screening performance. A policy allowing earlier collection could improve timeliness of reporting screening results. Genet Med 18 3, 259–264.
More
Translated text
Key words
early blood specimen collection,newborn screening,sensitivity,specificity,timeliness of newborn screening
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined