Comparison of predictive powers of functional and anatomic dosimetric parameters for radiation-induced lung toxicity in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose To investigate the predictive value of the perfusion (Q) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)-weighted dose–function histogram (DFH) obtained mid-treatment (mid-Tx) with radiotherapy (RT) for radiation-induced lung toxicity (RILT) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Materials and methods The study population consisted of NSCLC patients who were undergoing RT treatment and enrolled in prospective imaging studies. Q-SPECT was performed prior to and during RT (at ∼40–45 Gy). A baseline dose–volume histogram (DVH) and mid-Tx DVH based on simulation CT as well as a baseline DFH and mid-Tx DFH based on Q-SPECT were calculated. Only patients with stage III NSCLC and visible functional lung (FL) changes on the mid-Tx scan were eligible for this enriched analysis. RILT was graded according to a reported scale. Results Forty-two stage III NSCLC patients met the criteria for inclusion. The accumulative incidence of grade ≥2 RILT was 31% in this high-risk population. Significant differences in functional metrics such as functional lung volume FV5–FV20 at increments of 5 Gy and functional MLD (FMLD) were observed between patients with and without grade ≥2 RILT (p < 0.05). Similar results were also obtained for anatomical metrics from V5–V20 and MLD (p < 0.05). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) ranged from 0.724to 0.812 for baseline DVH parameters, from 0.745 to 0.830 for mid-Tx DVH parameters, from 0.764 to 0.878 for baseline DFH parameters, and from 0.767 to 0.891 for mid-Tx DFH parameters. Further principal components analysis showed that the AUCs were 0.814/0.817 and 0.790/0.857 for baseline/mid-Tx DVH and baseline/mid-Tx DFH, respectively. Conclusions Mid-Tx DFH parameters based on Q-SPECT were significantly elevated in patients with grade ≥2 RILT in this study population. Among the metrics compared, mid-Tx DFH seemed to have better predictive accuracy, but this difference did not reach statistical difference.