Search
ChatPaper
AI Writing
analysis
Analysis
编组
Open Data
more
More
RankingsMust ReadingJournal&ConferenceAI TRAI HistoryMaster Reading TreeXiaomai's Star TalentsTrajectoryTalentNDI TrackerOpenAI sign Language
VIPCreated with Sketch.

Researchers, Patients, and Stakeholders Evaluating Comparative-Effectiveness Research: A Mixed-Methods Study of the PCORI Reviewer Experience.

Laura P Forsythe,Lori B Frank,Rachel Hemphill, A Tsahai Tafari,Victoria Szydlowski,Michael Lauer,Christine Goertz,Steven Clauser

Value in Health（2018）

Cited 14|Views18
No score
Abstract
PCORI Merit Reviewers' self-reports indicate that the perspectives of different reviewer types are influential in panel discussions and Merit Review outcomes.
More
Translated text
Key words
comparative-effectiveness research,Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI),patient/stakeholder engagement,peer review,research proposal review
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined