From XE-2100 to XN-9000, from SIS Standard to GFHC recommendations for slide review: potential impact on review rate and turnaround time.
ANNALES DE BIOLOGIE CLINIQUE(2017)
Abstract
In 2014, we moved from XE-2100 with Standard SIS rules to XN9000 withGFHCrecommendations for slide review. The aim of our studywas to evaluate the potential impact of the new Sysmex r automation with implementation of GFHC rules on our review rate, turnaround time (TAT), workload and on CD34+ stem cells enumeration. We conducted a retrospective observational study from September 2013 through August 2014, in CHU Dinant Godinne UCL Namur. With the GFHC recommendations and the new Sysmex r automation, we significantly reduced our review rate by nearly 30% considering all units (35.8% vs 25.9%), and up to 73% when excluding oncology haematology department (17.5% vs 4.7%). We also noticed significantly shorter TAT for CBC measurement (median for routine samples: 76.4 vs 56.8 minutes, p < 0.0001; urgent samples: 18.9 vs 15.2 minutes, p = 0.023), slide review (median: 54.9 vs 36.4 minutes, p < 0.0001) and CD34+ enumeration performed on peripheral blood samples (p< 0.001) and on apheresis samples (p = 0.026). In conclusion, GFHC recommendations implemented on the new Sysmex r XN-9000 resulted in a significant reduction in reviewrate and in TAT. This is particularly of interest for the clinicians with subsequent potential faster patient management.
MoreTranslated text
Key words
haematology analyser,rules,slide review,review rate,GFHC,turnaround time
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
![](https://originalfileserver.aminer.cn/sys/aminer/pubs/mrt_preview.jpeg)
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined