A Comparative Study of Full-Thickness Blepharotomy Versus Transconjunctival Eyelid Lengthening in the Correction of Upper Eyelid Retraction in Graves’ Orbitopathy

Background The study was designed to compare the outcome of full-thickness blepharotomy and transconjunctival eyelid lengthening in the correction of upper eyelid retraction (UER) in patients with Graves’ orbitopathy (GO). Methods This is a prospective randomized interventional study. Following ophthalmic examination, determination of the ocular surface disease index (OSDI) and photography, 27 patients with UER were randomly assigned to either graded full-thickness blepharotomy (G1) or transconjunctival Müller muscle recession and graded disinsertion of the levator palpebrae superioris muscle (G2). Six months later, patients were reevaluated. Digital images were analyzed with the assistance of customized software. A standardized “normal range” of upper eyelid height and contour was calculated based on healthy controls. The outcome of the two groups was compared. Results Forty-seven eyelids of 27 patients (19 female) with UER were included. Twenty-seven eyelids (15 patients) were allocated to G1 and 20 eyelids (12 patients) to G2. On average, surgery lasted 37.46 ± 5.73 min in G1 and 32.70 ± 8.39 min in G2. Based on the margin reflex distance, 93% of the eyelids in G1 and 85% in G2 were within the normal range after surgery. The corresponding figures for lid contour were 63 and 55%. Both groups displayed significant improvement in OSDI scores. No significant difference was observed in the overall comparison. Conclusions The two surgical techniques were equally effective in the treatment of UER from GO. Postoperative contour outcomes were considerably worse in patients with severe UER than in patients with mild or moderate UER, regardless of group. Level of Evidence II This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 . Study registered on ClinicalTrial.gov number: NCT01999790