Transition from Round to Shaped Implants in Immediate Breast Reconstruction: Our Preferred Approach and Clinical Outcomes

Background Smooth, round, silicone implants predominate device-based breast reconstruction in the USA; despite their prevalence, complications can include bottoming out, superior contour deformity, rippling, and/or lateral malposition. This complication profile increases the need for revision surgery and subsequent patient dissatisfaction. With the resurgence of shaped, textured, silicone implants in the USA, we report the senior author’s success with these devices and outline a strategy to optimize outcomes in breast reconstruction surgery. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted on a prospectively collected IRB-approved database of nipple-sparing mastectomies (NSMs) with immediate breast reconstruction with smooth, round, silicone implants (Group A) in 2011 in comparison to textured, shaped, silicone implants (Group B) in 2012. Changes in operative technique were highlighted and extrapolated. Outcomes were reviewed. Results In Group A, 128 NSMs were performed in 76 patients. In Group B, 109 NSMs were performed in 59 patients. Thirteen percent of patients in Group A had direct to implant reconstruction as compared with 21% in Group B. Patients with textured, shaped implants were more likely to have acellular dermal matrix (61 vs 34%, p < 0.0001) than those with smooth, round implants. Patients who had smooth, round implants were more likely to have postoperative nipple malposition (18 vs 0%, p < 0.0001,) and rippling (29 vs 0%, p < 0.0001.) Patients with textured, shaped implants had fewer operative revision reconstructions as compared with those with smooth, round implants (36.71 vs 12.8%, p < 0.0001) Based on these results, our technique has evolved and has eight key technical modifications. Conclusion With a few adaptations in surgical technique, the transition to textured, shaped, silicone devices for breast reconstruction can be seamless with superior breast contour and reduced complications/revision rates. Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .