What Is The Best Multimodality Combination For Intraoperative Spinal Cord Monitoring Of Motor Function? A Multicenter Study By The Monitoring Committee Of The Japanese Society For Spine Surgery And Related Research

Study DesignSurgeon survey.ObjectiveTo analyze multimodal intraoperative monitoring (MIOM) for different combinations of methods based on the collected data and determine the best combination.MethodsA questionnaire was sent to 72 training institutions to analyze and compile data about monitoring that had been conducted during the preceding 5 years to obtain data on the following: (1) types of monitoring; (2) names and number of diseases; (3) conditions of anesthesia; (4) condition of stimulation, the monitored muscle and its number; (5) complications; and (6) preoperative and postoperative manual muscle testing, presence of dysesthesia, and the duration of postoperative motor deficit. Sensitivity and specificity, false-positive rates, and false-negative rates were examined for each type of monitoring, along with the relationship between each type of monitoring and the period of postoperative motor deficit.ResultsComparison of the various combinations showed transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potential (TcMEP)+cord evoked potential after stimulation to the brain (Br-SCEP) combination had the highest sensitivity (90%). The TcMEP+somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) and TcMEP+spinal cord evoked potential after stimulation to the spinal cord (Sp-SCEP) combinations each had a sensitivity of 80%, exhibiting little difference between their sensitivity and that obtained when TcMEP alone was used. Meanwhile, the sensitivity was as low as 50% with Br-SCEP+Sp-SCEP (i.e., the cases where TcMEP was not included).ConclusionsThe best multimodality combination for intraoperative spinal cord monitoring is TcMEP+Br-SCEP, which had the highest sensitivity (90%), the lowest false-positive rate (6.1%), and the lowest false-negative rate (0.2%).